The Belém Blues: What COP30 Delivered (And What It Absolutely Didn’t)

Stepping off the plane last night, I still felt the faint trace of Amazon humidity clinging to my skin, as if the rainforest hadn’t quite let me go. It’s strange; I went to COP30 with the weight of Palau, who I represented, in my hands, and I came home with the weight of the world on my heart. Belém was verdant, alive, vast, a city perched between river and forest, between ancient ecological wisdom and urgent planetary crisis. It was the perfect place to host a climate conference that demanded courage.

And yet, as always, what we needed and what we achieved were not always the same.

Much like Miami, the air both inside the negotiating rooms and outside in the sweltering heat was thick with urgency. Though now, I have swapped the deep green pulse of the Amazon rainforest for our own salty, humid reality back here in Miami and have been reflecting on what COP30 accomplished, what it didn’t, what it all means for South Florida, and what’s next.

What COP30 Accomplished

For those of us living on the front lines of sea level rise and monster storms, the big wins were all about survival and fairness.

1. A Stronger Global Mitigation Pledge

For the first time, nearly every major emitter agreed to submit enhanced 2035 Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) by next year (2026), and to align those targets with the 1.5°C pathway. This is a milestone that many of us, especially those representing vulnerable nations, have been fighting toward for years.

While the language was carefully negotiated (as always), the commitment is real enough to matter: a global push to accelerate the phase-out of coal and limit new fossil-fuel permitting. Not a full ban, but a turn in the right direction

2. A Renewed Adaptation Goal With Actual Numbers

This was one of Palau’s top priorities, and I am proud of what we secured: a dedicated adaptation finance floor — not just a wish list, but a real number. Parties agreed to a political signal to triple adaptation finance by 2035. For small island states, this means reliable resources for seawalls, freshwater protection, food security, and coastal resilience.

While 2035 is not soon enough, it sets a clear, global expectation to scale up resources. For SIDS and coastal communities, this is a much-needed signal that the world acknowledges the damage is here and requires real money.

3. New Protections for Indigenous Communities of the Amazon

Given where we met, this felt deeply symbolic. For the first time, Indigenous Peoples, whose land and knowledge are literally saving the world’s most vital ecosystems, participated in greater numbers than ever before. Brazil announced new Indigenous territories, and amajor new forest finance facility was launched, partly dedicated to supporting Indigenous Peoples and local communities.

Being in Belém, on the Amazon’s doorstep, made it clear that protecting nature protects people. The recognition of Indigenous land rights as a climate solution is critical, and we need to remember that lesson in Florida as we fight to protect our own vulnerable ecosystems, from the Keys to the Everglades. 

4. A Just Transition Mechanism

The parties agreed to establish the Belém Action Mechanism (BAM) for a Global Just Transition. This formalizes the idea that climate action must be fair, especially for communities and workers who suffer the most (but historically have contributed the least to climate change).

This is a big win for climate justice advocates. It means the global shift toward clean energy isn’t just about technology; it now has a formal UN home to coordinate assistance, protect workers, and ensure that developing countries can grow their economies without polluting the way the G-20 (countries of major economies, collectively contributing to 85% of global GDP and 73% of fossil fuel emissions) did.

What COP30 Did NOT Accomplish

1. A Full Fossil Fuel Phase-Out

Despite more than 80 countries advocating for a global roadmap to “phase out” fossil fuels, the final text of the Global Mutrião (meaning “collective effort”) decision failed to include any binding commitment or roadmap to phase out, or even phase down, fossil fuels. The word “fossil fuels” was effectively scrubbed from the final decision.

This was the heartbreak of Belém. The science is screaming at us. We are already acknowledging the likelihood of overshooting 1.5°C of warming (and have done so temporarily). Yet a powerful coalition of wealthy, oil-rich nations (including the United States, which was conspicuously absent) successfully blocked any meaningful commitment to address the crisis’s root cause. It’s unconscionable. Petrostates weaponized the entire negotiating process to protect their profits over our future.

2. Loss & Damage Funding Still Lags Far Behind Reality

Despite progress last year, the COP30 replenishment round fell significantly short of the scale scientists say is necessary. For nations like Palau, whose present-day losses are existential, this shortfall cuts deep.

Imagine asking a family losing their home to rising seas to “wait for the next fiscal cycle.” That’s the message they hear.

3. Weak Accountability Mechanisms

Yes, countries agreed to submit improved national climate plans. No, there are no strong enforcement tools if they fail.
We left with a framework, but not with teeth.

4. Forest Commitments Without Enforcement

Despite the Amazon’s symbolic importance at this COP, the failure to agree on a binding global roadmap to halt deforestation was deeply disappointing. We need clear, enforceable rules, not just new finance mechanisms that lack accountability. The Amazon is one of the Earth’s two lungs. Without a binding global agreement, we’re essentially leaving our life support system vulnerable to the highest bidder. Being in Belém should have been the final, definitive moment for forest protection, but instead, it ended in compromise.

The Bottom Line for Miami & What Comes Next

Representing Palau was as humbling as it was heartbreaking. When I sat in rooms full of negotiators, I carried the stories of families who live meters from shorelines that shrink every year. I thought about the coral reefs I’ve studied since childhood, reefs now bleaching, weakening, dissolving. I thought about the children I’ve met who already talk about relocation, as if their homeland’s expiration date is written in tide charts.

COP30 was a mixed bag of necessary technical progress and catastrophic political failure.

But it did deliver momentum, and sometimes, in the climate fight, momentum is the currency of hope. We secured better tools for adaptationand formalized the concept of a fair transition. That’s the good news.

The truly terrifying news is that the powerful fossil fuel lobby (the same actors who block clean energy laws here in Florida) is still successfully vetoing global climate action. In fact, fossil fuel lobbyists outnumbered every single delegation at COP30, except for Brazil’s. They are holding our cities, our coral reefs, and our future hostage.

The fight isn’t over. In fact, it just got harder. We can’t wait for the next COp; we must turn up the pressure on our own elected officials to enact mitigation that the global stage failed to deliver. The next time I post, I hope it will be about how we plan to use the Belém wins to push for local change, because our survival depends on it.

#AlwaysBelieve, #BeInconvenient, #MyOceanPledge, #RatherBeInCourt, #SaveMiami, 1.5 degrees, Climate Change, Delaney Reynolds, Eco Warrior, Global Warming, Miami, Miamisearise.com, Politics, Sea Level Rise, Sea Rise, The Sink or Swim Project

A Day in the Life at COP30

If you’ve been following my work for a while, you know that the annual UN Climate Conferences (COPs) aren’t exactly glamorous. They’re inspiring, stressful, frustrating, hopeful, exhausting, and energizing all at once.

Here at COP30 in Belém, Brazil, I’ve been working for the small island state of Palau, and the conference has, true to form, been all of these things rolled into one, and I thought you might find the daily details of what happens at these unique meetings interesting.

My work this year has had me deep in the weeds of climate finance negotiations, the alphabet soup of COP, where terms like NCQG (New Collective Quantified Goal), SCF (Standing Committee on Finance), GEF (Global Environment Facility), GCF (Green Climate Fund), AFB (Adaptation Fund Board), FRLD (Fund for responding to Loss and Damage), and Article 2.1(c) (all finance acronyms/terms) get tossed around like everyone was born speaking the unique United Nations language that intends to save Earth from burning. These discussions ultimately decide whether frontline communities, including small island states like Palau, will actually receive the financial support they need to survive a warming planet. Palau and developing nations like it around the world contribute nearly nothing to the cause of our climate crisis, yet are subject to its warming oceans, elevated temperatures, and rising sea levels in alarming, disproportionate ways that place their nations and the people who live there at dire risk. So yes, the stakes are high… and the hours are long.

Daily Schedule: 8 AM – 9 PM (or Later)

Most mornings start with a quick breakfast eaten while scrolling through overnight draft negotiation texts and tracking which paragraphs have magically appeared, disappeared, or multiplied. By 8:00 AM, I’m heading through security on my way to the Alliance of Small Island States’ (AOSIS) morning coordination, where small island nations coordinate their positions on different agenda topics to align as a larger group of 39 countries.

After that, and maybe grabbing another cup of coffee, it’s time to sit through, some days, four or five negotiations in a row (Article 9.5 transparency, the Standing Committee on Finance (SCF), Global Environment Facility (GEF) replenishment guidance, Adaptation Fund negotiations), and so forth. Each one with its own tone, tensions, and tiny battles hiding in the footnotes.

It is during these meetings that you hear nations argue over whether the COP will “invite,” “request,” or “urge” countries to contribute to a fund (yes, this matters). Developing countries will fight to keep language, ensuring that all developing nations, not just a select few, have access to the funds they need to protect themselves. Developed countries will insist on deleting paragraphs that micromanage the fund’s Board. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) will try to hold the line on adaptation finance and the New Collective Quantified Goal on Climate Finance (NCQG) target. Everyone will bracket everything (bracketed text is not agreed upon or official until the brackets are removed).

By late afternoon or, on many days, evening, the room temperature is usually warm (or unusually cold this year, especially for Brazil), the coffee is flowing, and the interventions start getting pointed. Sometimes even loud. In the hallways, leaders, negotiators, diplomats, and civil society huddle to strategize and support one another in a battle whose stakes are, in many cases, survival. These are the moments you realize international climate diplomacy is equal parts politics, persistence, and people.

This is the COP rhythm: intense, purposeful, and powered by caffeine, urgency, and a belief that we must do better.

A Rare Day Off: Breathing in Belém

The annual COP meetings take place over about two weeks, and participants work six days straight, taking off Sunday. Amid the choreographed chaos of COP, on my one day off, I wanted to step into a different world and spent the day at Parque do Utinga, just outside Belém, wandering along leafy trails surrounded by the symphony of the Amazon Rainforest. And honestly, it was magical.

Amazonia, long a symbolic, hopeful location for this COP meeting, is stunningly beautiful. As I strolled through Parque do Utinga, monkeys were swinging overhead from tree to tree, butterflies the size of my hand drifted by like living confetti, and birds of every color imaginable were saying hello in, I assumed, Portuguese from the canopies or while wading in tall grass. As far as you can see, there is an endless array of plant life, vines, flowers, and towering trees so tall that they reminded me exactly what we’re fighting for inside those windowless negotiation rooms back at the conference center.

For a few hours, I wasn’t thinking about brackets or paragraphs or whether “mobilize” should be replaced with “channel.” I was thinking about the Amazon, about places like Miami and Palau, about our ocean, about the ecosystems and people whose lives depend on these negotiations landing in the right place.

Why I Keep Coming Back

The work is long, and the days are longer at these conferences. And yet, moments in Parque do Utinga and in the plenary when countries stand up for justice, equity, and survival in the only international climate forum we have on earth remind me why I do this and why I love doing it.

Communities like mine in South Florida don’t have the luxury of waiting for perfect politics. Neither do SIDS, LDCs, or anyone living on the frontlines of rising seas, intensifying storms, and unbearable heat. No matter the hours or the imperfections in the process, we have no choice but to continue fighting until we solve this ever-so complex global problem.

And so, it is. Aside from the travel, long hours, and nonstop challenges of trying to get nearly 200 nations to agree on how to fix and finance the solutions needed, I plan to keep showing up. Whether tracking paragraphs, translating jargon, endlessly negotiating, or pushing for real financial answers to protect those most vulnerable, and all the rest that happens in a blur at a COP. The work is worth it for places like Miami, small island states like Palau, and, most certainly, the “lungs of the Earth,” as the Amazon has been called, to thrive, let alone survive.

#AlwaysBelieve, #BeInconvenient, #MyOceanPledge, #RatherBeInCourt, #SaveMiami, 1.5 degrees, Climate Change, Delaney Reynolds, Eco Warrior, Global Warming, Miami, Miamisearise.com, Palau, Politics, Sea Level Rise, Sea Rise, The Sink or Swim Project

I’m Off to Belém, Brazil for COP30

I am off to the Amazon Delta — the gateway to the Amazon rainforest — to visit Belém, Brazil, for the United Nations’ Conference of the Parties (COP30) meetings today. I can already feel the humid air of the rainforest, hear its deep green pulse, envision the river’s sinew winding through the Amazon, hear the song of frogs, and see the hush of timber-giants overhead. This will be my first time in Brazil, but more than that, my first time in the Amazon region itself: a place of both immense life and immense risk. Unlike previous UN COP events I’ve attended, I step into Belém not just as a delegate but as a witness, to the Amazon forest, yes, but also to the immense potential that forests, wetlands, oceans, and coastal communities around the world hold in this fight to fix our climate.

My time in Belem will be working as a lawyer and designated delegate for the Republic of Palau, a small island nation standing at the front lines of the climate crisis. For Palau, as is the reality here in South Florida, rising seas are not a future projection; they are already reshaping lives. As I work to help them in Belém, I plan to carry with me the voices of communities whose reefs are salt-etched, whose coastline is eaten by tides, and whose children rightfully ask what their future holds. When we talk about climate change, the headlines often center on vast continents or major pollution emitters like America’s oil companies, but for Palau and other small island states, the story is one of urgency, justice, and survival.

Palau, a pristine archipelago of approximately 340 islands scattered across the western Pacific Ocean, is a nation of breathtaking beauty known for its vibrant coral reefs, turquoise lagoons, and deep cultural ties to the ocean, but also of extraordinary vulnerability. Science tells us that sea levels around Palau are rising at nearly twice the global average, threatening low-lying coastal villages and vital infrastructure.

Ocean warming has already disrupted the island’s delicate balance of marine biodiversity, home to more than 1,300 species of fish and 700 species of coral, while intensifying storms and shifting rainfall patterns place further strain on freshwater supplies and agriculture. For Palau, climate change is not abstract science; it is a lived reality, measured in saltwater intrusion, eroding shorelines, and the fading colors of once-flourishing coral gardens.

“The failure to limit global heating to 1.5 °C is a moral failure and deadly negligence. Every fraction of a degree means more hunger, displacement, and loss – especially for those least responsible.”
Antonia Guterres, UN Secretary General

COP30 Goals & Opportunities

Dedicated readers might recall my post over this past summer, Delay, Denial & Disturbing Developments in Bonn, following the three weeks I spent in Germany as a delegate for another Small Island Developing State, in that case, the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM). That annual meeting of the Subsidiary Bodies of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change serves to advance the nuts-and-bolts details of the issues that the UN and the world’s nations are trying to address during the COP events, such as those happening this week in Brazil.

In that post, I outlined a variety of concerns that I witnessed in Bonn to the world making substantive progress on addressing our climate crisis, including:

1) The United States was NOWHERE to be found,

2) Wealthy, oil-rich nations repeatedly blocked progress,

3) There was little consensus on an agenda with over 50 topics and, perhaps most disturbing to me,

4) There were obvious attempts by the world’s oil- and gas-producing nations to sideline scientific facts and findings about the damage fossil fuels are having on our planet.

Will these same impediments to progress still be present in Brazil? Brazil’s President, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has said COP30 should be the “COP of Truth” and that “now is the time to take seriously the warnings of science.” I could not agree more, and will be fascinated to witness whether the world decides to take a step towards solutions or allows wealthy oil-rich nations and the fossil fuel-producing polluters to limit our progress in the Amazon.

As we begin our work this week, I am going to hope that progress is made and, with this in mind, offer a few key issues that I believe will dominate COP30:

1. Emissions & Mitigation

Over the summer, I also authored a post about why keeping temperatures within 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels is critical to our planet and each other. The target of limiting warming to 1.5°C remains central to any progress in fixing our climate, so reducing fossil fuel dependence, accelerating renewable energy deployment, and closing the gap between what the nations of the world pledge and the actual progress they are making are critical to our success in Belém.

2. Adaptation & Resilience

For Palau and many others, the question is: how do we adapt to the damage fossil fuel use over the last 100 or so years has caused? That means resilient infrastructure, coastal protection, mangrove restoration, and improved early warning systems. Adaptation cannot be an afterthought.

3. Nature-based Solutions & The Amazon

Having this conference in Belém, on the edge of the Amazon, is symbolic and vital. The Amazon is one of the planet’s lungs, a biodiversity powerhouse, a carbon sink. Protecting it, funding that protection, and guarding against tipping points are each crucial. The question is, will being in one of the world’s most important environmental regions be “motivational” to everyone in attendance?

4. Climate Finance, Transparency, & Implementation

It’s one thing to make big statements in a press conference, but another to deliver real results. Past COPs have set ambitious goals, but follow-through often lags. At COP30, there’s pressure to close the ambition–delivery gap. Ensuring that money flows to where it is most needed (especially to vulnerable states), that commitments are truly transparent, and that mechanisms exist for monitoring and accountability are vital to solving what’s truly a worldwide problem.

5. Equity, Inclusion, & Climate Justice

Climate change is not just a scientific or economic challenge; it’s a justice issue. Ensuring that small island states like Palau, frontline communities (including South Florida), and Indigenous peoples (including those in the Amazon region) have a seat and equal voice at the negotiation table and real influence is critical to success. Vulnerable nations need not only promises but predictable, reliable finance and mechanisms for the loss and damage they are suffering.

6. China “Versus” the United States

Another critical component of COP30, in my view, is that the United States, the world’s largest producer of crude oil and the second-largest emitter of carbon, has announced it will not send a delegation to Brazil. China, the world’s largest producer of coal and number one emitter of fossil fuel pollution will, however, be here and engaged.

I am increasingly concerned that America’s politicalization of our climate crisis has created staggering economic opportunities for other nations in important (and lucrative) fast-growing markets such as sustainable energy and electric vehicle manufacturing. For countless business and environmental reasons, it’s important that the U.S. finds a way to set politics and pandering to fossil fuel interests aside before other nations create dominant market positions and reap the riches of the global transition to a sustainable energy-oriented economy that is already underway.

Looking Ahead

As I leave for Brazil, my heart is full of hope while my mind is focused on reality. For the Amazon and world beyond, this conference is more than a story about forestry; it’s about planetary health. For Palau, my work is more than diplomacy; it’s about survival. In Belém, I hope to walk among trees that have stood for centuries, reflect on the voices of islanders who may stand for only decades more if we fail, and witness a conference that bridges hope with action. As always, I will do my best to provide you with an honest account of what was achieved, what fell short, and what comes next.

Allow me to end this post by extending my heartfelt thanks to those folks who have made this possible. Thank you to Dr. Jessica Owley and Val Fajardo (Environmental Law Fellow) at the University of Miami School of Law, whose mentorship and guidance have long supported my path in climate law and international environmental governance. And, thank you to the incredible team representing the Republic of Palau, including Joe Aitaro and Palau’s President Surangel Whipps Jr., for allowing me the honor of representing you and the people of Palau in Belém.

The Sink or Swim Project
1 2 3 4 5 6 … 78